After you finish your first playthrough, does it end up being a bit more boring if you start your second right after? I've been meaning to start the Bioshock series, so would I be better off playing that first and then coming back to the witcher for maximum fun?

SPOILERS:








Talking about the decision of wether to kill Henselt or not. I feel disappointed with the moment, in that I think sparing Henselt is the obvious "right" choice. Witchers are supposed to stay out of political affairs. Geralt has never been a guy that acts out of emotion, making decisions out of rage. Lastly, this whole damn quest you've been on all game is about finding and killing a king-slayer. Why become a king-slayer yourself and aid Letho's agenda just like that?

I just don't see any way that the character of Geralt could choose to kill Henselt. Now I'm not trying to bash people that chose to kill him, I actually am eager to hear what the reasoning is for making such a decision.

Edit; I haven't finished Chapter 3 yet so I'd appreciate it if there were no spoilers from it in this thread.

I just don't see it. Can someone give me a reason as to WHY Geralt would even consider siding with Iorveth? Even if he isn't fond of Roche, he still just let him out of prison and kind of owes him while all Iorveth did was attack him. :/

Just curious on what you guys went with for your canon, although I'm sure many will replay the game with different TW2 files.

EDIT : Label your spoilers if you're going to say any. Thanks dragonbird.

Like the title says. I know that Iorveth's cause it to make life better for non-humans, but what is Roche fighting for?