Great idea!

Ah you mean The curse of the ring movies?

Yeah well apart from your lovely movie

I prefered the flashbacks/summaries in TW1 rather than in TW2. The artwork/paintings were beautiful, compared to TW2 brutal flashback scenes. Maybe this is irrelevant in this topic, but I had to spill it out hehe

I agree with what Dona said, "more Loki please, but not one you're kinda forced to feel sorry for". In the movie Loki is pictured as an evil guy, but kind and weak on the inside. He's played by a guy no taller or heavier than any other guy, although he's a giant god. Why isn't it mentioned that Loki is the mother of Sleipner (by turning into a mare and breed with a magical stallion), the father of the Fenris Wolf (who will swallow Odin himself), and the father of the Midgard Serpent, surronding the world?

And as Volsung said, Surtr should be the greatest threat, becuase he will be the one burning the world into nothing remains but ashes, with his sword of flames.

Even though much could be done better it's nice that they've made movies based on the Norse Mythology, since there haven't been anyone before as far as I know.