Reputation: 48 Excellent
|Active Posts:||156 (0.23 per day)|
|Most Active In:||General Discussion (98 posts)|
|Joined:||08 February 12|
|Last Active:||Today, 12:42 AM|
Posts I've Made
Yesterday, 11:57 PMI really would still have a lot to say on the topic of implementing a "nudity option", especially since I couldn't reply to those who addressed me on the first thread, but honestly, I've grown all too tired of trying to show some sense to a wall. I'd say that hopefully my point has been made, but judging from the answers I got there, it really seems it hasn't. Oh well.
The object of discussion seems to have turned to boob physics now anyway, and that's great. Just letting you know that I demand extreme realism on that issue and won't admit anything less than perfection.
FracturedEarth said:Just thought of something, why don't CDPR let us fight female human/elf enimies like in skyrim? ›››
Ummm, maybe? Why? You could fight elven women in the first game, and you had the instance to kill a couple of women in the second, and this sentence is getting creepy.
Yesterday, 11:39 PM
SystemShock7 said:Well, I just went to youtube to sample a few vids of him.. still obnoxious.
Yes, I did say I don't see the usefulness of a review of any subjective matter. ›››
I'm seriously start to think that I have close to zero capability of making people understand what I write, or even see it. I think I'll just stop.
Yesterday, 08:19 PM
SystemShock7 said:Um... no. I don't *see* it. Rants are never a way to "effectively evaluate" anything, but to each his/her own.
... kind of amusing the "it's just that - an opinion" thingy going on now. ›››
But you're referring to the only video you saw, the rant about YouTube. The guy is a game reviewer, that's why he's mad at that whole business. You said that you don't see the usefulness in "reviewers", did you not? Well, I thought the usefulness of the figure to be beyond evident.
And what's amusing about that "thingy"?
Yesterday, 07:09 PM
SystemShock7 said:As a general comment, I don't see the interest in the "critic" or the "expert", or even the mere "reviewer". In matters of taste, or any subjective matter, I prefer to try stuff for myself and form my own empirical opinion. ›››
I think you don't *feel* the interest, because *seeing* that someone else's opinion might be useful, especially if that someone knows what they're doing and can effectively evaluate the product's pros and cons so that you don't have to go in blind, is plain as day. Unless it's entirely a matter of taste, which amounts to never in the field of videogames, the opinion of a reviewer is close to essential for some.
But as for the opinion that Angry Joe is obnoxious, it's always just that - an opinion.
Yesterday, 05:54 PMYou obviously didn't even bother to read what that thread was about, or you just don't care and could have avoided referring to it, since you're clearly not tackling the same issue. More specifically, one that's not even an issue.
Nobody is going to censor the game, and nobody asked for it. That's all your fantasy, and don't worry, it's just not going to happen. Still, I don't really share your need to observe in-game vaginas in every anatomic detail, but eh. Whatever, I'm not going to complain about it if that happens (even if half the media on this planet would), just think it's unnecessary. They did fine in The Witcher 2.
Oh, and that part about fruits is... just... what?
Sirnaq said:Reopening threads that are locked by moderators is generally not good idea. ›››
It wasn't locked for the discussion in itself, just for some posters that were starting an "America versus Europe" fight. Personally, I believe it could have been solved by simply deleting the incriminated posts instead of locking it all. People were having quite some fun too.
the Fixer hasn't added any friends yet.