ssssssssssssssss
Witcher 3 on consoles - target 60fps or 30? 1080p or 720p ?
21.02.2013 @ 14:28 #1
I was playing Witcher 2 at ultra in 1080p at 30-40fps on my PC, and it was great, but I would much prefer 60fps.
I would sacrifice some effects and polygons for that (talking about console version here!)
Personally I choose the fourth option - give me 1080p/60fps on consoles, CDP!
21.02.2013 @ 14:34 #2
So I say, none of these options. Give me a fifth one where I can have everything 1080p, 60 FPS and awesome polygons, effects and so on provided I have a strong enough rig and if you don't you can still achieve 60 FPS by lowering effects and such.
PCs by their nature should account for ALL these options anyway.
As for the PS4. Eh dunno.
Jan Bartkowicz: Your tribute video "Lands Of North" is awesome!
Witcher: Enhanced Edition Walkthrough [Hard]
Witcher II: Enhanced Edition Walkthroughs [Hard]
21.02.2013 @ 14:46 #3
Costin Moroianu said:
So I say, none of these options. Give me a fifth one where I can have everything 1080p, 60 FPS and awesome polygons, effects and so on provided I have a strong enough rig and if you don't you can still achieve 60 FPS by lowering effects and such.
PCs by their nature should account for ALL these options anyway.
As for the PS4. Eh dunno. ›››
Pretty much this.
21.02.2013 @ 15:36 #4
So I'd need to agree with everyone else. All four options are too low as targets. And what you get will depend on what you play the game on.
My Mods: Hoodless Dark Mode Armor --- Hoodless Kayran Armor --- Hoodless Elven Jacket --- Hoodless Blue Stripes
21.02.2013 @ 15:50 #6
I would like to hear one thing from CDPR; They said that TW2 will be the best looking RPG on 2011, now it would be amazing if they could say the same thing about TW3!
21.02.2013 @ 16:39 #7
For PC such presets are pointless.
21.02.2013 @ 16:50 #8
A coworker was talking about the supposed specs of the PS4 saying it would destroy gaming PC's. I took a look at them and sighed. Those specs look like a modern medium-range PC. The difference is all PS4's and X720's will share the exact same architecture and configuration and developers can optimize their games for that, so they can take the system to the limit. But I believe the average PC gamer already has a machine with similar or better performance.
As others said, CDPR doesn't have to "target" anything for the PC, because it's an open platform and different people will be able to run games at different levels of performance. I, however, expect RED Engine 3 to not be much more demanding than RED Engine 2, perhaps even more efficient, but considering the large, open world we anticipate for TW3 we might need machines a bit more powerful than the minimum for TW2.
For consoles, I suppose they will have something like true 1920x1080 and medium settings at around 30-40 FPS.
PC does not equal Windows. Personal computers run many different operating systems, like GNU/Linux and, why not, Windows. PC games should be available for all major platforms. Let's not be handcuffed and tied to one vendor. Utilize standard, cross-platform technologies!
** The Witcher IRC Channel (unofficial) ** irc://irc.xertion.org/TheWitcher ** Instant webchat: http://mibbit.com/#T...irc.xertion.org
21.02.2013 @ 16:56 #9
Costin Moroianu said:
So I say, none of these options. Give me a fifth one where I can have everything 1080p, 60 FPS and awesome polygons, effects and so on provided I have a strong enough rig and if you don't you can still achieve 60 FPS by lowering effects and such.
PCs by their nature should account for ALL these options anyway.
As for the PS4. Eh dunno. ›››
Yes yes well obviously this is mostly aimed at consoles, on PC you are limited by your budget. Thank you captain obvious : ). Still the console target could have some impact on the PC version as well, for example the scale of various graphics options.
21.02.2013 @ 17:18 #10
.Volsung. said:
Actually if you take a look at Steam's survey statistics you will find out that average PC specs are way below specs of PS4.
21.02.2013 @ 17:58 #11
Aver said:
Well I suppose people with all sorts of machines use Steam, since they have a LOT of casual games as well. A coworker of mine plays games like Tower Defense on his old laptop all the time, using Steam. But that's not a gaming PC.
PC does not equal Windows. Personal computers run many different operating systems, like GNU/Linux and, why not, Windows. PC games should be available for all major platforms. Let's not be handcuffed and tied to one vendor. Utilize standard, cross-platform technologies!
** The Witcher IRC Channel (unofficial) ** irc://irc.xertion.org/TheWitcher ** Instant webchat: http://mibbit.com/#T...irc.xertion.org
21.02.2013 @ 18:10 #12
.Volsung. said:
Even if you won't count mobile video cards. I would say that there are a lot of 'gaming' video cards there, but a lot of them are like 4-5 years old. People just don't buy new hardware that often. Only 45% of graphics card supports DX11 and since 2009 every new card supports DX11
21.02.2013 @ 19:35 #14
Aver said:
PS4 is looking like the equivalent of a PC with a weak CPU and a strong GPU comparable to a desktop 7850. If what we've seen from TW2 is a good predictor, they may well be able to get 60 fps at 1080 from it.
All desire to shirk,
Shall during off hours exhibit his powers
To Madame Tussaud's wax-work.
[G&S, "A more humane Mikado"]
21.02.2013 @ 20:04 #15
My collector edition pre-order will never occurs because of that news!
With all this mentality about listening to your fans, you are now on the train wreck to hell where you are never going to be able to dodge the catastrophe you have initiated.
21.02.2013 @ 20:13 #18
Redgarl said:
My collector edition pre-order will never occurs because of that news!
With all this mentality about listening to your fans, you are now on the train wreck to hell where you are never going to be able to dodge the catastrophe you have initiated. ›››
Redgarl said:
Not useless console jokes which aim for 60 fps by 1080p... little news, I already play at that resolution at better frame rate than that! ›››
You are being absolutely ridiculous. The fact that TW3 will be released on consoles TOO doesn't mean that they won't make a proper PC version. Did you even play The Witcher 2? It is available on the XBox 360 and still it is one of the better looking games on PC. Few current PC's can handle TW2 with maximum detail (including Übersampling), especially at the resolutions you suggest.
And finally, WHO CARES ABOUT GRAPHICS? What we want is an excellent game.
PC does not equal Windows. Personal computers run many different operating systems, like GNU/Linux and, why not, Windows. PC games should be available for all major platforms. Let's not be handcuffed and tied to one vendor. Utilize standard, cross-platform technologies!
** The Witcher IRC Channel (unofficial) ** irc://irc.xertion.org/TheWitcher ** Instant webchat: http://mibbit.com/#T...irc.xertion.org
21.02.2013 @ 20:49 #19
Redgarl said:
My collector edition pre-order will never occurs because of that news!
With all this mentality about listening to your fans, you are now on the train wreck to hell where you are never going to be able to dodge the catastrophe you have initiated. ›››
They could do with a lot less "fans" like you. Jesus Christ. I can't stand people like you making paper weight threats. CDPR NEED to be on all top platforms, PC, PS4 and NextBox so they can increase the size of their team and fund their own games.
A proper fan would be happy with this expansion.
21.02.2013 @ 21:00 #20
Agbeth said:
This is about consoles. Obviously on PC you can go as far as your budget allows. God I really hate having to restate the obvious..
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help


58004
PM




















