The Witcher board : Why the sorcerers are so weak in the TW games - The Witcher board

Jump to content

Community Discussions

ssssssssssssssss

  • 5 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Why the sorcerers are so weak in the TW games


    • Posts: 31
    • Joined: 22 August 11
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

19.02.2013 @ 23:36 #1

In the Books, the sorcerers are really OP, they can do really amazing thing, but in the games... They are really weak! In the Witcher 3. I want to see really challenging fights against sorcerers in 1 vs 1
0


    • Posts: 633
    • Joined: 01 January 13
    • Location: Germany, Essen
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

19.02.2013 @ 23:39 #2

That's really a good question, maybe it would be gamebreaking if they would make them as powerful as they are in the books.

It took 2 sorceresses to blow up a whole castle, that's pretty impressive.
1

Maerd 

    • Posts: 258
    • Joined: 05 January 08
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 00:29 #3

Yeah, in the books one sorcerer or sorceress were worth an army and that's why they were so powerful. CDPR really downgraded them.
0


    • Posts: 880
    • Joined: 05 December 08
    • Location: Sweden
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
1550047
40

20.02.2013 @ 00:30 #4

It'd be awesome, true, to face of against a truly insane mage and come out victorious. Bragging rights ftw!

But think about mages from a balancing point of view. It'd be pretty insane if everytime a mage enters the fray, he just obliterates everyone and everything. You want combat to be diverse and exciting. Having various different enemies doing different things and having mixed attack patterns, really brings combat to life and engages the player. It's basically a bit of story-gameplay segregation going on here. Mages are insane in the books while the game has to depict them a bit less insane in order for the game to be playable.

I don't mind at all. I haven't read the books personally, but they're two different mediums and portray things differently for different purposes. The game is supposed to be fun to play. I don't really care about the nitpicky über consistency, life's too short for that.
Tearing my hair out, trying to figure out why there aren't any non-human Witchers, or at least something equivalent to a Witcher oriented warrior.

Share your Skyrim characters here! Feel free to post pictures, tell a story, or whatever! It's all about dem adventures boios!
3


    • Posts: 227
    • Joined: 10 January 12
    • Location: Puerto Rico
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 00:55 #5

An excuse could be that niflgaard and the north had lost most of its strongest mages by then, likely most of the mages you fought were newbie,low ranking mages.

Old powerful mages still exist but they are few and far between by now. like the zerrakian mage of the first game, who had defeated geralt ( geralt, who btw was a guy who had beaten the strongest mages in the books.) or dethmold who single-handedly broke the walls of vergen.

Another thing is that a mage needs to "charge up" if im not mistaken. so he can be taken out if caught by surprise while he is relaxing. Like dethmold when he was with his lover or the mage Letho killed in the intro.
Shit happens...
0

Sirnaq 

    • Posts: 1857
    • Joined: 01 August 11
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 01:07 #6

Quote

Weak sorcerers


Casting firestorm that burned to a crisp two armies consisted of thousands of soldiers you call weak? Not to mention the most powerful bosses in both games are mages.
Posted Image
0

Maerd 

    • Posts: 258
    • Joined: 05 January 08
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 01:14 #7

Azar Javed was a pussy, he didn't even use magic when he was fighting. And Triss told that he was a powerful mage.

In chaper two of TW2 you can fight Dethmold in the caves on Iorveths path and he doesn't impress either. And you cannot say he wasn't prepared.

In the books Yennefer, for example, could turn the entire mob of people into geese and other animals (don't remember exactly) just like that.
0


    • Posts: 304
    • Joined: 27 September 11
    • Location: Quebec
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
109633
959

20.02.2013 @ 01:14 #8

The mage with cynthia was cool. Clone stuff.
0

Maerd 

    • Posts: 258
    • Joined: 05 January 08
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 01:15 #9

Sirnaq said:

Casting firestorm that burned to a crisp two armies consisted of thousands of soldiers you call weak? Not to mention the most powerful bosses in both games are mages. ›››


That was the whole Lodge together, if you remember, not Sabrina herself.
0

Sirnaq 

    • Posts: 1857
    • Joined: 01 August 11
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 01:23 #10

Maerd said:

Azar Javed was a pussy, he didn't even use magic when he was fighting. And Triss told that he was a powerful mage.

In chaper two of TW2 you can fight Dethmold in the caves on Iorveths path and he doesn't impress either. And you cannot say he wasn't prepared.

In the books Yennefer, for example, could turn the entire mob of people into geese and other animals (don't remember exactly) just like that. ›››

Only magic user that was canonically powerful we met so far was philippa. What about operator in tw2? Hardest boss battle in the game. Also both triss and dethmold in books are weaklings.

Maerd said:

That was the whole Lodge together, if you remember, not Sabrina herself. ›››


Doesn't really matter, it was only 7 of them and they basically created mini atomic bomb there. Also consider how powerfull curse sabrina used on her own.
Posted Image
0


    • Posts: 799
    • Joined: 24 April 12
    • Location: Under a rock
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
351185
290

20.02.2013 @ 01:29 #11

Quote

Azar Javed was a pussy, he didn't even use magic when he was fighting


In chapter 2, the swamp weakened him greatly.

In chapter 5 he used a great deal of power to summon the koschey. Also, he was fighting two witchers (only Geralt if he-who-shall-not-be-named-for-spoilers-sake was not there) in close combat. Trying to cast a spell within sword range is just asking to die.

Besides, Vilgefortz, an incredibly powerful mage, outright owned Geralt with just a steel quarterstaff.


"All gone. Soup only stay." -Mr. Troll
"Remember, remember, the 5th of Novemeber March" -Glaroug
Tell Google to boil its bottom. Try duckduckgo.com today for your search engine needs. QUACK!
Software is like sex. Its Better when its free. Go TUX!!!
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
0

Maerd 

    • Posts: 258
    • Joined: 05 January 08
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 01:34 #12

Operator is not a mage, but some magical creature. You know, mages are humans in the end. They need to eat, drink and sleep at least, the operator is something else. Besides, he's not that powerful in the sense his power was in the gargoyles that were fighting for him, alone he couldn't do anything special.
0


    • Posts: 2987
    • Joined: 01 August 11
    • Location: Romania
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
869385
101

20.02.2013 @ 01:35 #13

He was summoning the bloody things. Just like Sile and Phillipa could.
0

Sirnaq 

    • Posts: 1857
    • Joined: 01 August 11
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 01:36 #14

Maerd said:

Operator is not a mage, but some magical creature. You know, mages are humans in the end. They need to eat, drink and sleep at least, the operator is something else. Besides, he's not that powerful in the sense his power was in the gargoyles that were fighting for him, alone he couldn't do anything special. ›››

Operator had all mages skills, so he was pretty much mage. Gargoyles were his summons, i se nothing wrong with that.
Posted Image
0

Maerd 

    • Posts: 258
    • Joined: 05 January 08
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 01:37 #15

Glaroug said:

Besides, Vilgefortz, an incredibly powerful mage, outright owned Geralt with just a steel quarterstaff. ›››


That was in the books. Mages in the books were very powerful. And, if I'm not mistaken, his quarterstaff was magically self-propelled. He even called it a "magic wand".
0

Sirnaq 

    • Posts: 1857
    • Joined: 01 August 11
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 01:43 #16

Maerd said:

That was in the books. Mages in the books were very powerful. ›››


There were powerful mages in the books, but most mages were just as powerful as mages in the games. Read again thanned part and how most of them died there. Books geralt would easily slice his way through most sorcerers.
Posted Image
0

Chopy 

    • Posts: 84
    • Joined: 16 November 10
    • Location: Vilnius
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 01:59 #17

In the books Vilgefortz was the only really powerful sorcerer.

Maerd said:


In the books Yennefer, for example, could turn the entire mob of people into geese and other animals (don't remember exactly) just like that. ›››


I do not recall that.During pogrom in Rivia , Yeneffer almost got her ass kick by a mob , she managed to scorch one or two peasants.Triss helped her , dragged her away and casted a powerful hail , than nobody was able to repeat.
0


    • Posts: 633
    • Joined: 01 January 13
    • Location: Germany, Essen
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 02:00 #18

It was one of the short stories, the hunt for the dragon.
0

Maerd 

    • Posts: 258
    • Joined: 05 January 08
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip

20.02.2013 @ 02:03 #19

Costin Moroianu said:

He was summoning the bloody things. Just like Sile and Phillipa could. ›››


Was he? I thought he died from one slash of overpowered alchemical build before he could lift a finger... ::)
0


    • Posts: 5235
    • Joined: 26 February 10
    • Location: Valhalla
  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
88560
1507

20.02.2013 @ 02:18 #20

Sile traps a beast the size of a small office building, Sabrina torches an entire army, Phillipa controls a powerful dragon and guides Geralt through the mist. This is weak?
0

Share this topic:


  • 5 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users