[Mr iggy 456]

Could there be more blood and gore in the witcher 3 would anyone like it?

[alextyc1]

Why do you need more gore?
I think there was enough gore in both witcher games.

[Purpleknight]

I don't think there is a reason of TW3 being more gory, it just don't fit with the saga of books or the games :S . Besides, more gore and blood would be unrealistic and would stain the game's atmosphere, presenting a more "visceral panorama".

In fact, I was shocked by some gory comic cut-scenes in The Witcher 2, because it just stood out from the rest of the game. Like trying to give more cruelty to something that is already cruel by itself (meaning the slaughters and that stuff).

[slimgrin]

Well, I would like to be able to lop off heads again. If anything, I want better blood effects. It was awfully...splashy in TW2.

[frontovika]

OP is probably a gorephile. Witcher's "bloody" enough as it is, thanks.

[Mr iggy 456]

frontovika said:

OP is probably a gorephile. Witcher's "bloody" enough as it is, thanks. ›››

DELETED BY MODERATOR


Moderator: Disagree with IDEAS all you like, but please be respectful of PEOPLE. Insulting other members is forbidden on this forum.

This post has been edited by Corylea: 19.01.2013 @ 21:56
Reason for edit: Insult to another forum member removed

[Parcival Godrigson]

Well... he maybe meant that he wanted for body parts to be taken off seperatly. As to, allow some of the kills to chop off heads, or seperate arms, etc. But, I don't see as if this would make any good difference. I liked the ammount of gore as it was, perfect for me.

You want gore over gore? Go get some Warhammer 40k, we're pretty neat here. n.n-b

[Mr iggy 456]

Some of y'all need to tone down the small hostility I'm sorry made a poll that ask if ya want more gore or not like shit chill out.

[alextyc1]

Well actually i think they can add just a little bit of gore but not in ridiculos amounts as in DA2 (DAO was "kinda" balanced with the gore )

[Mr iggy 456]

alextyc1 said:

Well actually i think they can add just a little bit of gore but not in ridiculos amounts as in DA2 (DAO was "kinda" balanced with the gore ) ›››

DA2 went overboard with it DAO had a nice balance.

[Bloth]

Personally I thought that Assassins of Kings got it about right, and both Dragon Age's went overboard with it, to the point of silliness. I do miss the body parts lying around in the first game though, that was seriously sick, then again we've got the quite gruesome cutscene kills.

Cool Avatar Mr Iggy.

[Corylea]

Mr iggy 456 said:

DA2 went overboard with it DAO had a nice balance. ›››

Yeah, DA2 was silly, wasn't it? Characters were completely dripping with gore after every fight. Instead of making the combat look more serious, it just made it look more cartoonish ... which actually fit very well with DA2's combat system.

I liked having heads roll by in TW1; I hope we'll get them back in TW3.

[Benzenzimmern]

I kind of liked the "blood feature" of The Witcher 1. You could see patterns of blood on the floor that changed with your fighting style. It looked as if the blood spurted directly from the tip of the sword.

[Mr iggy 456]

Blothulfur said:

Personally I thought that Assassins of Kings got it about right, and both Dragon Age's went overboard with it, to the point of silliness. I do miss the body parts lying around in the first game though, that was seriously sick, then again we've got the quite gruesome cutscene kills.

Cool Avatar Mr Iggy. ›››

Corylea said:

Yeah, DA2 was silly, wasn't it? Characters were completely dripping with gore after every fight. Instead of making the combat look more serious, it just made it look more cartoonish ... which actually fit very well with DA2's combat system. />

I liked having heads roll by in TW1; I hope we'll get them back in TW3. /> ›››

DAO was good with the gore it didn't go overboard but it didn't skimp out ether and thanks bro and having more executions and having a moderate bloodier combat would't be so bad.

[Aver]

I didn't voted because there is no option "I don't care".

[Mr iggy 456]

Aver said:

I didn't voted because there is no option "I don't care". /> ›››

You were saying.

[SlimeDynamiteD]

I don't think more blood and gore is necessary in TW3, we don't want the game to become a Tarantino movie
That said, I think the game has enough cutting off legs and heads as it is

[slimgrin]

SlimeDynamiteD said:

I don't think more blood and gore is necessary in TW3, we don't want the game to become a Tarantino movie
That said, I think the game has enough cutting off legs and heads as it is ›››

There is no head cutting..

In TW1 there was a glorious spinning sword swipe that'd leave a foe's head twenty paces away. Ah, memories...

[SlimeDynamiteD]

There is not?
I thought I cutted someone's head off... Hmm... Strange o.o

[marden13]

I think Witcher 2 had a good balance. Not too over the top but it also wasn't afraid to show some gruesome scenes (near the end of Act 3).

So I don't think there is a need for more gore in TW3 but that's how I see it.