ssssssssssssssss
Would this PC run it?
28.04.2011 @ 04:04 #1
I've found this computer but im not sure how will it would run, by looking at it i can tell it would run the witcher 2 pretty well, but for once id like to play a new game on the highest of the high!
http://www.computerl...asp?systypeid=4
Thank you in advance for any response!
28.04.2011 @ 04:31 #2
Quote
I've found this computer but im not sure how will it would run, by looking at it i can tell it would run the witcher 2 pretty well, but for once id like to play a new game on the highest of the high!
http://www.computerl...asp?systypeid=4
Thank you in advance for any response!
It should run the game well, though not at highest settings. I don't know prices in NZ, other than that they're very high, so I'll take your word for it that it's a good deal. But note that it is sold without an operating system, so you're going to have to add the cost of a copy of Windows 7.
The GPU and the CPU are your weak points. I'll deal with each separately.
The GTS 450 is well above "minimum" requirements, but not up to "recommended" requirements. If you could see your way clear to a GTX 460, GTX 460 SE, or an AMD (ATI) HD 5850, 5870, or better, you would beat the "recommended" requirements, which should get you maximum settings or very close to them.
The Phenom II 555 is a dual-core CPU, but it has two additional, disabled cores. Many users have had good luck "unlocking" the disabled cores, giving you a free upgrade to a three-core or four-core CPU. Unlocking requires a motherboard that supports it; fortunately, yours does. There's no guarantee, but you stand a decent chance of unlocking and ending up with the equivalent of a quad-core 955.
If you succeed in unlocking the CPU, and you can upgrade the GPU to the next price point, you are pretty much sure of being able to max the game out. Even if you do neither, you will get very good, though probably not maximum, performance.
All desire to shirk,
Shall during off hours exhibit his powers
To Madame Tussaud's wax-work.
[G&S, "A more humane Mikado"]
28.04.2011 @ 11:40 #3
I was talking with my other computer friends and after some discussion we came to a group conclusion that this PC would be best value for money for what i want it to do.
http://www.computerl...127&systypeid=4
i would add another 2gbs of DDR3 ram to it.
thanks in advance!
28.04.2011 @ 19:34 #4
Quote
I was talking with my other computer friends and after some discussion we came to a group conclusion that this PC would be best value for money for what i want it to do.
http://www.computerl...127&systypeid=4
i would add another 2gbs of DDR3 ram to it.
thanks in advance!
I know it's a couple hundred more, but I like everything about it better. You wouldn't need the additional RAM. The 3-stick configurations are only useful for Socket 1366; Socket 1155 CPUs want their memory sticks in pairs.
You'll still need to buy a Windows 7 license, since it is quoted without an OS.
All desire to shirk,
Shall during off hours exhibit his powers
To Madame Tussaud's wax-work.
[G&S, "A more humane Mikado"]
28.04.2011 @ 21:00 #5
You can find alot of tips on the internet, as well as precautions, its fairly simple, the only part i reckon is problamatic is whether you want some weird water cooler or your cables.
You do need to be careful but i would never ever buy a fully made computer now.
I built a pretty good computer, sourced most of the parts myself, i also researched the parts as well , (Guy N'wah helped me with the motherboard.)
Its up and running, cool, oddly quiet :D and i realy don't need to worry about anygame not running any lower that ultra for the next couple of years i guess. :)
28.04.2011 @ 23:48 #6
And thank you for the advice once again!
29.04.2011 @ 03:35 #9
Although good, the euro dollar parity is now very favorable to the euro and is dificult to my the estimate the price
I would not recommend build the equipment yourself, if you've never done before. I have always build my computers, but lately I build my PCs in the store where I usually purchased the hardware . There are many small and medium enterprises that build PC to enthusiast, where you can customize. In many of them can you choose all the components to assemble a unique and custom PC, but if you are not familiar with the hardware, the best is buy the pre-builded PC provided by these shops to enthusiast . You can always ask for certain custom components.
You just have to choose a preconfigured model and customize the most important components to play. The graphics card and CPU. Select you a enthusiast or at least , a perfomance CPU and graphic card . The rest is secondary, but you must pay attention to the cooling / noise of the system, if possible, choosing a quality sink, a graphics card that is not noisy and a pretty and silent computer case .
Example , Ibuypower , with lot of options , many pre-build configurations to enthusiast looks very good,
http://www.ibuypower.com/
http://www.ibuypower...Store/Special-A
http://www.ibuypower...eries.aspx#p=p1
http://www.ibuypower...ore/Mage_XLC_M1
Maingear - less options
http://www.maingear....p?idproduct=601
http://www.maingear....xcube/index.php
http://www.maingear....p?idproduct=607
Another example is Dell-Alienware
http://configure.us....nware-aurora-r3
And many more in U.S. Maybe it is interesting that the company is in California if you live in California, a delivery of RMA to the east coast has to be very expensive if not does the warranty cover the delivery . In Europe the distances are smaller ;) .
Sorry for me english
29.04.2011 @ 03:46 #10
I'm hoping I will finish it by May 17 so I could test this game out maxed with and try to see if 3d Vision is worth the extra $180. I suggest building a computer because it's a lot cheaper, but like the other user has stated Ibuypower is also a good website.
29.04.2011 @ 04:56 #11
Quote
The OP is in New Zealand, and the prices are in NZ$. As beautiful a country as New Zealand is, I hope to be fortunate enough never to have to pay NZ prices for computers or parts.
Yeah, US $600 might be enough. But the OP can't buy in the US.
All desire to shirk,
Shall during off hours exhibit his powers
To Madame Tussaud's wax-work.
[G&S, "A more humane Mikado"]
29.04.2011 @ 06:39 #12
More interesting part in www.computerlounge
http://www.computerl...stembuilder.asp
29.04.2011 @ 16:37 #13
Hello! I'm a really big fan of the first Witcher RPG, one of my favorite games. I'm definitely wanting Witcher 2 but the requirements make me worry, along with the fact that there is not a demo or a benchmark until some unknown time after release.
My PC is as follows:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ (2.3 GHz)
4GB RAM
nVidia GeForce 9600 GT
Obviously, my processor is the lowest of my system. However, if you can confirm that the game would run reasonably well, I will gladly throw down the money through GoG to help CD Projekt directly with my funds. I just do not have the funds at this time to upgrade and I'd hate to miss out on what looks to be a really fantastic game.
Thanks for your time,
29.04.2011 @ 18:04 #14
Quote
Hello! I'm a really big fan of the first Witcher RPG, one of my favorite games. I'm definitely wanting Witcher 2 but the requirements make me worry, along with the fact that there is not a demo or a benchmark until some unknown time after release.
My PC is as follows:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ (2.3 GHz)
4GB RAM
nVidia GeForce 9600 GT
Obviously, my processor is the lowest of my system. However, if you can confirm that the game would run reasonably well, I will gladly throw down the money through GoG to help CD Projekt directly with my funds. I just do not have the funds at this time to upgrade and I'd hate to miss out on what looks to be a really fantastic game.
Thanks for your time,
It's slightly below minimum, due to the graphics card. We don't have much information on how well below-minimum systems will play the game; all we're able to do is infer that because the game is known to play fluently on systems that meet the stated minimum requirements, it should play only a little less well on systems that are slightly below minimum.
I think it's a good bet that it will be playable, but it might want some tweaking to make it play better. Since anything with an Athlon 64x2 has seen some years of use already, the biggest improvement you could make would be to run a really good defragmenter (I like MyDefrag, which used to be JkDefrag) over your disk before installing. And get a can of air and evict the dust bunnies.
All desire to shirk,
Shall during off hours exhibit his powers
To Madame Tussaud's wax-work.
[G&S, "A more humane Mikado"]
29.04.2011 @ 18:59 #15
I bought two new machines last September, knowing that the old ones would not be best for the new release.
BOTH AMD and Nvidea Can you run it type websites say I Will NOT BE ABLE to Run the game I have waited so patiently and I am gonna be nuts!
GRRRR its two weeks before the game release and I am really hoping that either the websites are wrong -- or that someone is already working on a fix for less than optimal systems. AND I am still really PO'd that a brand new WIN7 computer that beats the pants off the specs comes out as insufficient to run this game due to a slightly underpowered graphics card.
current graphics card (because I am limited to 300W power supply) is the Radeon HD 3650. see this post for more computer info about this machine http://tw2.thewitche...8207#msg5438207
Someone want to make any suggestions? I would love to hear them.
29.04.2011 @ 19:12 #16
Quote
I bought two new machines last September, knowing that the old ones would not be best for the new release.
BOTH AMD and Nvidea Can you run it type websites say I Will NOT BE ABLE to Run the game I have waited so patiently and I am gonna be nuts!
GRRRR its two weeks before the game release and I am really hoping that either the websites are wrong -- or that someone is already working on a fix for less than optimal systems. AND I am still really PO'd that a brand new WIN7 computer that beats the pants off the specs comes out as insufficient to run this game due to a slightly underpowered graphics card.
current graphics card (because I am limited to 300W power supply) is the ATI HD 3650.
Someone want to make any suggestions? I would love to hear them.
Well, first off, "can you run this game" Web sites don't know any more about your computer than Zoltan Chivay knows about runes ("I don't know shit about runes"). Don't get upset over them. All they can do is compare what they think your computer has against a number of often inaccurate and always inadequate rules.
Second, salesmen lie (actually, just tell the customer what they think the customer wants to hear). Computer salesmen are as bad as car salesmen, only your bank account takes less damage when they sell you a lemon. There is no substitute for understanding the specifications of what you are buying and how these compare to the programs you want to run, relying on your own research and on the advice of those who aren't trying to sell you something.
What specs do your new computers have? (I'm guessing that the HD 3650 is the card in your old computer.)
All desire to shirk,
Shall during off hours exhibit his powers
To Madame Tussaud's wax-work.
[G&S, "A more humane Mikado"]
29.04.2011 @ 19:30 #17
I added a link to a previous post with my data -- it just doesn't have the card included, but the card is easy to look up too . The card in the old computer wasn't even PCIe it was a lesser card by far in the olden days :P
This card is DirectX 10.1 shader 4.1 vertex shader 4.1 crossfire capable 512 mb
29.04.2011 @ 19:56 #18
Quote
29.04.2011 @ 20:01 #19
Sounds a bit mad but thats what we did when we got powercuts up north.
My computer runs on oil. :D
However that stuff with the electrical systems in your house is realy not fun :(
I hope something comes your way and fixes it :)
29.04.2011 @ 20:03 #20
Quote
I added a link to a previous post with my data -- it just doesn't have the card included, but the card is easy to look up too . The card in the old computer wasn't even PCIe it was a lesser card by far in the olden days :P
This card is DirectX 10.1 shader 4.1 crossfire capable 512 mb
Let's see what we can do for something a little closer to spec than the 3650 and a little better on actual (as opposed to manufacturers' overstated requirements) power requirements.
In ATI cards, the minimum spec is a 3850, which has 320 shaders and can do 10.7 GP/s and 10.7 GT/s (gigapixels and gigatexels per second). The 3650 has just 120 shaders and can do just 2.9 GP/s and 5.8 GT/s. It might actually be enough to run the game on minimum, since all evidence is that the game plays quite well at minimum specs, but let's try to do better.
Your 3650 draws 65W TDP (total design power). My experience with cards like this is ATI is pretty good at estimating the actual power. So let's assume we are limited to 65W TDP, and we can't squeeze an additional 10W out of your system.
Other ATI cards around 65W TDP are the 4670, 5670, and 6670 (OK, the 6670 is 66W.) These come much closer to the game's minimum requirement, but they're not going to bust your power supply. I think they reach about 90% of the minimum (the minimum works out to about 11,000 3DMark06, and I get better than 10,000 on my not-yet-tuned 5670 rig).
All desire to shirk,
Shall during off hours exhibit his powers
To Madame Tussaud's wax-work.
[G&S, "A more humane Mikado"]
Sign In »
Register Now!
Help


PM
7904










